Its got USB-C, though, and you can get a USB-C to HDMI adapter for like 15$. I use my laptop primarily to lecture and give talks from, and the lack of an HDMI port I think kills this laptop as an option for me. I would imagine this laptop plays pretty similarly to how other ultrabooks do, but I was curious if it might be able to wring out a little better performance than my MBP.Įdit: The more I look into it, the more I think I’ll skip this gen (at least). I play WoW on mobile maybe twice a year tops, but it’s nice to have the ability to do so. So, better than the MBP by far, most likely.Įdit: Yeah, looking at it, this is a Ryzen-based Surface, so its a mobile Ryzen APU - so the Vega 11 is likely just a downclocked version of what is in the 2400/3400G desktop parts, so itll be quite a bit better than the old MBP and any Intel integrated solution and even that discrete Nvidia MX 150 or whatever it is.

The Vega 11 can run 1080p/medium settings in a lot of games at very playable framerates it plays Classic just fine at 1080p and settings around 7 on my HTPC (2400G). Vega 11 is what is in the 2400/3400G desktop - i imagine the “Surface Edition” is probably just clocked a little lower. I think they’re integrated, but they might perform OK. It’s got AMD Radeon™ RX Vega 11 Graphics Microsoft Surface® Edition, whatever that means.

Surface go 3 gaming